- AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR5
- 128 GBSSD
- 15.6″ 60Hz
- 3.92 lbs
Acer Aspire Slim 8GB vs ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T
Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10
Winner: Acer Aspire Slim 8GB
Acer Aspire Slim 8GB takes 10.5 weighted points vs 2.8, winning on CPU Benchmark, RAM, Storage. The ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T counters in a higher tier — worth it if its strengths match your needs.
Acer Aspire Slim 8GB
Intel Core 3 N355 · Integrated (Intel iGPU)
ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T
Intel Celeron N4500 · Integrated (Intel iGPU)
Use-Case Scores
| Category | Aspire Slim 8GB | VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | 2.1/10 | 1/10 |
| Productivity | 3/10 | 2.1/10 |
| Programming | 2.3/10 | 1.1/10 |
| Engineering / 3D | 2.5/10 | 1/10 |
| Student | 4.1/10 | 4.4/10 |
| Travel / Portability | 2.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| AI Workloads | 2.2/10 | 1/10 |
| Value for Money | 6.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
Detailed Specification Comparison
| Spec | Aspire Slim 8GB | VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core 3 N355 | Intel Celeron N4500 |
| PassMark Score | 10,446 | 1,770 |
| CPU Cores | 8 | 2 |
| GPU | Integrated (Intel iGPU) | Integrated (Intel iGPU) |
| G3DMark Score | — | — |
| RAM | 8 GB DDR5 | 4 GB DDR4 |
| RAM Upgradeable | No (soldered) | No (soldered) |
| Storage | 128 GBSSD | 64 GBeMMC |
| Display | 15.6″ IPS | 14″ IPS |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1366x768 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Pixel Density | 141 PPI | 112 PPI |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Weight | null lbs | 3.3 lbs |
| Thickness | 0.74″ | 0.67″ |
| Amazon Rating | 4.5 ★ (580) | 3.7 ★ (299) |
| Value Score | 6.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
CPU Comparison
The Acer Aspire Slim 8GB's Intel Core 3 N355 is ~490% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (10,446 vs 1,770). A generational gap you will feel in exports, compiles and heavy multitasking.
GPU & Gaming
Neither carries a dedicated GPU — both fine for esports at low settings, neither for modern AAA gaming.
Productivity & Battery
Office scores: 3/10 vs 2.1/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.
Display
Aspire Slim 8GB: 15.6″ IPS 1920x1080 @ 60 Hz. VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T: 14″ IPS 1366x768 @ 60 Hz. Panel quality is effectively even.
RAM, Storage & Upgradeability
Aspire Slim 8GB: 8 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 128 GBSSD. VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T: 4 GB DDR4 (soldered) + 64 GBeMMC.
Build & Portability
null lbs / 0.74″ vs 3.3 lbs / 0.67″. The ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T is 3.3 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 2.9 vs 4.7.
Value
Value scores land 6.5/10 vs 4.6/10. The Acer Aspire Slim 8GB extracts more performance per dollar.
Final Verdict
Buy the Acer Aspire Slim 8GB — it wins the weighted spec battle. Choose the ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T only if portability matter more to you.
Also Consider
Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-31P-3947
General · Traditional · 4.3 (654)
- Intel Core i3-N305
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR5
- 128 GBFlash
- 15.6″ 60Hz
- 3.9 lbs
ASUS Vivobook Go E1504FA-AS33
General · Traditional · 4.3 (408)
- AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR5
- 128 GBSSD
- 15.6″ 60Hz
- 3.59 lbs
ASUS Vivobook X1404VA-I38128
General · Traditional · 3.9 (6)
- Intel Core i3-1315U
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR4
- 128 GBSSD
- 14″ 60Hz
- lbs



