Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ vs Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH

Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10

Winner: Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ

Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ takes 9.3 weighted points vs 4, winning on CPU Benchmark, Refresh Rate, Thickness. The winner also sits in a more competitive value tier — a clear-cut call.

Winner

Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ

AMD Ryzen 7 260 · NVIDIA RTX 5060

Under $1400
4.1 (66)
Check Prices
VS

Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH

Intel Core i7-13620H · NVIDIA RTX 5070

Under $1700
4.2 (23)
Check Prices

Use-Case Scores

CategoryNitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJA16 CWHI3US864SH
Gaming6/106.2/10
Productivity4.6/105.2/10
Programming5.4/105.6/10
Engineering / 3D5.9/106/10
Student4.4/105.2/10
Travel / Portability3.6/104.9/10
AI Workloads5.9/106/10
Value for Money8.3/107.8/10

Detailed Specification Comparison

SpecNitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJA16 CWHI3US864SH
CPUAMD Ryzen 7 260Intel Core i7-13620H
PassMark Score29,76924,554
CPU Cores86P+4E
GPUNVIDIA RTX 5060NVIDIA RTX 5070
G3DMark Score18,19720,472
RAM32 GB DDR532 GB DDR5
RAM UpgradeableYesYes
Storage1 TBSSD1 TBSSD
Display16″ IPS16″ IPS
Resolution1920x12001920x1200
Refresh Rate180 Hz165 Hz
Pixel Density142 PPI142 PPI
TouchscreenNoNo
Weightnull lbs4.9 lbs
Thickness0.79″0.91″
Amazon Rating4.1 ★ (66)4.2 ★ (23)
Value Score8.3/107.8/10

CPU Comparison

The Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ's AMD Ryzen 7 260 is ~21% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (29,769 vs 24,554). Noticeable in sustained workloads, less so in everyday browsing.

GPU & Gaming

The RTX 5070 in the Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH is ~13% faster (20,472 vs 18,197 G3DMark) — a modest but real FPS edge.

Productivity & Battery

Office scores: 4.6/10 vs 5.2/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.

Display

Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 180 Hz. A16 CWHI3US864SH: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 165 Hz. The Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ's higher refresh rate wins for motion clarity.

RAM, Storage & Upgradeability

Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ: 32 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 1 TBSSD. A16 CWHI3US864SH: 32 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 1 TBSSD.

Build & Portability

null lbs / 0.79″ vs 4.9 lbs / 0.91″. The Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH is 4.9 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 3.6 vs 4.9.

Value

Value scores land 8.3/10 vs 7.8/10. The Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ extracts more performance per dollar.

Final Verdict

Buy the Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ — it wins the weighted spec battle and costs less. Choose the Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH only if portability matter more to you.

Check PricesCheck Prices

Also Consider

More on the Acer Nitro V 16S ANV16S-41-R2AJ

More on the Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH