Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV vs Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH

Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10

Winner: Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV

Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV takes 10.5 weighted points vs 5.8, winning on CPU Benchmark, GPU Benchmark, Weight. The winner also sits in a more competitive value tier — a clear-cut call.

Winner

Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV

Intel Core i9 13900H · NVIDIA RTX 5060

Under $1600
5 (4)
Check Prices
VS

Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH

Intel Core i7-13620H · NVIDIA RTX 5070

Under $1700
4.2 (23)
Check Prices

Use-Case Scores

CategoryNitro V ANV15-52-98KVA16 CWHI3US864SH
Gaming6.1/106.2/10
Productivity5.2/105.2/10
Programming4.5/105.6/10
Engineering / 3D5.6/106/10
Student5.2/105.2/10
Travel / Portability5/104.9/10
AI Workloads5.5/106/10
Value for Money7.5/107.8/10

Detailed Specification Comparison

SpecNitro V ANV15-52-98KVA16 CWHI3US864SH
CPUIntel Core i9 13900HIntel Core i7-13620H
PassMark Score27,43424,554
CPU Cores6P+8E6P+4E
GPUNVIDIA RTX 5060NVIDIA RTX 5070
G3DMark Score20,83920,472
RAM16 GB DDR532 GB DDR5
RAM UpgradeableYesYes
Storage1 TBSSD1 TBSSD
Display15.6″ IPS16″ IPS
Resolution1920x10801920x1200
Refresh Rate165 Hz165 Hz
Pixel Density141 PPI142 PPI
TouchscreenNoNo
Weight4.66 lbs4.9 lbs
Thickness0.93″0.91″
Amazon Rating5 ★ (4)4.2 ★ (23)
Value Score7.5/107.8/10

CPU Comparison

The Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV's Intel Core i9 13900H is ~12% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (27,434 vs 24,554). In practice the difference is marginal.

GPU & Gaming

The RTX 5060 in the Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV is ~2% faster (20,839 vs 20,472 G3DMark) — a modest but real FPS edge.

Productivity & Battery

Office scores: 5.2/10 vs 5.2/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.

Display

Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV: 15.6″ IPS 1920x1080 @ 165 Hz. A16 CWHI3US864SH: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 165 Hz. Panel quality is effectively even.

RAM, Storage & Upgradeability

Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV: 16 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 1 TBSSD. A16 CWHI3US864SH: 32 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 1 TBSSD.

Build & Portability

4.66 lbs / 0.93″ vs 4.9 lbs / 0.91″. Effectively identical to carry. Travel scores: 5 vs 4.9.

Value

Value scores land 7.5/10 vs 7.8/10. The Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH extracts more performance per dollar.

Final Verdict

Buy the Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV — it wins the weighted spec battle and costs less. Choose the Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH only if budget matter more to you.

Check PricesCheck Prices

Also Consider

More on the Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV

More on the Gigabyte A16 CWHI3US864SH