- Apple M5 (10 Core)
- Integrated
- 24 GB DDR5
- 1 TBSSD
- 15.3″ 60Hz
- 3.32 lbs
ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 vs Dell 16 Plus DB16250
Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10
Winner: ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94
ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 takes 9.8 weighted points vs 5, winning on CPU Benchmark, Pixel Density, Thickness. The winner also sits in a more competitive value tier — a clear-cut call.
ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 · Integrated (AMD iGPU)
Use-Case Scores
| Category | Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 | 16 Plus DB16250 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | 3.7/10 | 3.7/10 |
| Productivity | 5.9/10 | 5.7/10 |
| Programming | 5.9/10 | 6/10 |
| Engineering / 3D | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Student | 6/10 | 5.6/10 |
| Travel / Portability | 6.6/10 | 6.3/10 |
| AI Workloads | 4.2/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Value for Money | 6.7/10 | 6/10 |
Detailed Specification Comparison
| Spec | Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 | 16 Plus DB16250 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V |
| PassMark Score | 29,570 | 19,876 |
| CPU Cores | 4P+6S | 4P+4E |
| GPU | Integrated (AMD iGPU) | Integrated (Intel iGPU) |
| G3DMark Score | — | — |
| RAM | 24 GB DDR5 | 32 GB DDR5 |
| RAM Upgradeable | No (soldered) | No (soldered) |
| Storage | 1 TBSSD | 2 TBSSD |
| Display | 14″ OLED | 16″ IPS |
| Resolution | 2880x1800 | 2560x1600 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel Density | 243 PPI | 189 PPI |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Weight | 4.14 lbs | 3.42 lbs |
| Thickness | 0.55″ | 0.67″ |
| Amazon Rating | 4.3 ★ (248) | 4.1 ★ (26) |
| Value Score | 6.7/10 | 6/10 |
CPU Comparison
The ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94's AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is ~49% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (29,570 vs 19,876). A generational gap you will feel in exports, compiles and heavy multitasking.
GPU & Gaming
Neither carries a dedicated GPU — both fine for esports at low settings, neither for modern AAA gaming.
Productivity & Battery
Office scores: 5.9/10 vs 5.7/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.
Display
Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94: 14″ OLED 2880x1800 @ 120 Hz. 16 Plus DB16250: 16″ IPS 2560x1600 @ 120 Hz. The ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94's OLED panel is the clear quality win.
RAM, Storage & Upgradeability
Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94: 24 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 1 TBSSD. 16 Plus DB16250: 32 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 2 TBSSD.
Build & Portability
4.14 lbs / 0.55″ vs 3.42 lbs / 0.67″. The Dell 16 Plus DB16250 is 0.7 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 6.6 vs 6.3.
Value
Value scores land 6.7/10 vs 6/10. The ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 extracts more performance per dollar.
Final Verdict
Buy the ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 — it wins the weighted spec battle and costs less. Choose the Dell 16 Plus DB16250 only if its specific strengths matter more to you.
Also Consider
- Apple M5 (10 Core)
- Integrated
- 16 GB DDR5
- 1 TBSSD
- 15.3″ 60Hz
- 3.32 lbs
Samsung Book5 Pro
Professional · 2-in-1 · 4.3 (60)
- Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
- Integrated
- 16 GB DDR5
- 1 TBSSD
- 16″ 120Hz
- 3.7 lbs
Samsung Book5 Pro NP964QHA-KG2US
Professional · 2-in-1 · 4.4 (63)
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
- Integrated
- 32 GB DDR5
- 1 TBSSD
- 16″ 120Hz
- 3.7 lbs


